I was watching a news story about the forthcoming election in Washington and realised I’d never written about Washington State wines. There are a number of really good wine making regions in the States, but with few exceptions, they all struggle to escape the shadow cast by California. Washington is one of those that buck the trend and with over 900 wineries to choose from, we should be drinking a lot more of it.
I’ve found the wines are just a bit more complex and interesting than those of the Napa valley and that’s not to take away from the superb quality of the latter. The main difference for me is that Washington’s wines often display subtle but evident tannins which is virtually a hanging offence in California.
It struck that some of my favourite wineries down the years are actually from the area including Chateau St Michelle, Hedges, Columbia Crest and the fabulously eccentric Charles Smith. That realisation has made me wonder just how on earth I’ve had this weird writers block about the region; talk about blind tasting!
Charles Smith ‘Velvet Devil’ Merlot
Charles Smiths wines all have a bit of a marmite presentation, but there’s nothing eccentric about the liquid. Dark cherries on the nose with smooth autumn fruits and a classic hint of cigar boxes on the finish. Superb!
The Good Spirits Co, Glasgow £17.90
Chateau St Michelle Dry Riesling
This is an absolute corker, with refreshing citrus aromas, zingy fruit and a crisp acidic finish. Pair it with shellfish or a creamy cheese for the best effect
Waitrose £9.99
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here